Sunday, August 28, 2011

Phil Kniss: The bread of life, and the life of bread

August 28, 2011 (Back to School Sunday)
John 6:35-51; Deuteronomy 6:4-9

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:




...or download a printer-friendly PDF file: click here

...or read it online here:

I think I understand why bread is so deeply associated with life.
I understand it from a historical perspective.
I understand it from a personal-emotional perspective,
I understand it from a theological perspective.

Bread as life, historically speaking,
is pretty straight-forward.
In virtually every culture, in virtually every period of history,
it is bread, in one form or another,
that is held up as the one essential food.
Bread is the one food necessary to sustain physical life.
Other foods are secondary and supplemental, to bread.
So the word “bread” is often used as a synonym for “food.”
“Breaking bread with someone,” is eating a meal with them.
It’s in the Lord’s Prayer that we pray here every Sunday,
and that some of us pray every day.
“Give us this day our daily bread” is a prayer
that God will provide physical food,
and all that we need to sustain physical life.
The metaphor goes beyond food,
to include all the necessities of life itself.
Being a “bread-winner” or “putting bread on the table”
means to provide whatever is needed for the life of a household.
So “bread” and “dough” have even become slang for money.

And from ancient times,
there has been an understanding that bread is made
from living matter itself.
Yeast is an active, living organism, a fungus.
Even long before science could identify and classify it,
people understood that the yeast culture
was something that needed to be “kept alive”
from one batch of loaves to the next.

So Jesus used a metaphor that everyone could easily grasp,
when he said “I am the bread of life.”
_____________________

But I also understand this association of bread with life,
from a deeply personal and emotional perspective.
And I think all of you could do the same.
For me, it’s connected to my grandmother.

I well remember walking into my Grandma Kniss’ house
to the smell of bread baking.
My grandparents, Lloy and Elizabeth Kniss,
always lived far away from where I lived as a child.
So whenever we visited we were treated like royalty.
Often, when we first walked in the door
the smell of bread baking would be in the air.
And it wouldn’t be too long, before a piece was offered.
It was still warm when she placed it in my hands,
and it had been spread lightly with real butter,
and on top of that, some homemade apple butter.
I would sink my teeth into that large, thick slice of bread
and I was next to heaven.
The sheer pleasure of it was partly due to its novelty.
My mother did not bake bread when I was growing up.
I don’t hold it against her.
We lived in Florida, without air-conditioning.
I can understand how kneading bread dough,
and running an oven all day,
while chasing four kids around the house,
didn’t much appeal to her.

So eating Grandma’s homemade bread and apple butter
was more than just a good culinary experience.
It had multiple layers of meaning.
It was pure physical pleasure, of course.
But it also conjured up a sense of welcome and belonging.
The bread meant the same thing as her arms around my neck
and a kiss on my cheek when I first arrived.
Grandma was truly grateful that I was there, with her.
And she showed that with hugs and kisses and bread.
That slice of bread was a slice of her love.
The bread nourished me, body, mind, spirit.
It was life, in the fullest sense.

To this day, when I smell bread baking,
I think of my grandmother and her house of welcome.

I’ve learned since,
that soft, white bread, even the hearty homemade kind,
is not all there is to bread.
I used to not understand why some people liked bread
that was dark, hard, and crusty,
that almost hurt your teeth biting into it.
And for that matter,
why some people liked hard cheese
that puckered up your mouth,
when you could have Velveeta and Kraft American slices.

It’s really only about ten years ago,
after doing some traveling in Europe,
and eating that combination of tough, crusty bread
and hard cheese,
that it dawned on me how wonderful it was.
Sitting around a butcher-block table
in a 300-year-old German farmhouse,
visiting with good friends,
and having to work a little bit
to eat these hearty, and basic food staples—
I understood, in yet another way,
why bread and life were so deeply connected.
_____________________

Now, I also understand this association of bread with life,
from a biblical-theological perspective.
There are the stories in Exodus
about God sending manna, a literal bread from heaven,
to sustain the life of the wandering Israelites.
There is the prophet Elijah, during a time he was hiding for his life,
that God sent him ravens,
with bread in their beaks,
to keep him alive in his utter isolation.
Then Jesus in the wilderness, fasting for 40 days,
was tempted by Satan to turn the stones into bread,
to satisfy his body’s severe hunger.
Jesus answered Satan with scripture,
“One does not live by bread alone,
but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.”
Bread is life for the body, yes.
But he was talking about other kinds of life,
and other kinds of bread.

And, most famously, today’s Gospel reading,
a parable-metaphor,
“I am the bread of life.
Whoever comes to me will never be hungry.”
And, “I am the living bread that came down from heaven.
Whoever eats of this bread will live forever;
and the bread that I will give for the life of the world
is my flesh.”
In other words, Jesus was saying,
Just as bread is essential for earthly life.
So am I your bread, for your heavenly life.
Eat of me (metaphorically speaking)
and you will live forever.
And Jesus took this metaphor,
and acted it out physically
in his last supper with his disciples,
breaking the bread, and passing it out, and urging them,
“Eat this bread. It is my body,
which I am offering up to be broken,
so that you might live.”

Every time we come to the communion table in gathered worship,
or in smaller group settings,
we are acting out this parable, this metaphor.
We are eating of the bread of life,
so that the life which is in the bread, will also be in us.
_____________________

It’s beautiful, this metaphor of bread as life.
And I understand it completely,
historically, personally, emotionally, biblically, theologically.
And so do you all, I’m sure.

We understand the bread of life, but what about the life of bread?
I mean, what is the nature of that life in the bread?
How does the life of bread become real in our experience?
How do we access that life?
How does it nourish us?
By what means does the bread of life, become our life?

It occurs to me,
that the life within the bread becomes our life,
only when it becomes a full and indistinguishable part of us,
only when it loses itself in us.
Physically speaking,
the bread we eat loses its bread-ness,
in our act of eating it.
It sacrifices itself,
so that the life it contains,
might take on a different form,
and course through our bloodstream.
That’s why Jesus made it a point to break the bread,
and call the disciples’ attention to his own soon-to-broken body.
In offering up his own body, his flesh,
Jesus was sacrificing life for life.
And, just as importantly,
he invited his disciples to make a regular practice of it.

He invited us to a way of life,
a way of regularly practicing the life of Christ,
practicing the life of broken bread.
He invited us to live into, to practice, a new model of the good life.
He invited us to see and experience the transformation made possible
when we let our life be subsumed in his life,
let our life be incorporated into his life,
let our brokenness be filled with his brokenness.

The way this happens—
and you’ve heard me say this before . . . often, and recently . . .
the way this happens is by
engaging in the practices of the Christian faith.

Bread does not become life to us
by some magical one-time transfer
of the life in the bread to the life in our body.
As if we eat the mystical bread,
and voila!, now that life is inside us.
No, it only becomes life if it’s our daily bread.
Only if we repeatedly, and intentionally, and communally,
offer up our own small and self-oriented life,
and partake of Christ the living bread.

Sometimes this happens in a practice involving
literal, physical bread,
like when we partake of bread during communion,
or . . . like in our particular small group,
a frequent practice in our weekly meals
is to pass the bread to each other around the table.
We often purposely leave the bread un-sliced,
so that we must physically break it, and pass it.
Sometimes, we’ve even spoken words when we pass it,
“remember Jesus, the bread of life” or something along that line.

However, most of the time, the practices I speak of
don’t involve physical bread.
But just as powerfully, they invite the real presence of Christ,
into the everyday stuff of our earthly lives,
to nourish and transform us.
This can be praying our daily prayers,
sometimes called “the daily office,”
with ourselves or with others.
It can be gathering for the reading and study of scripture.
It can be meeting for mutual discernment.
It can be this practice of corporate worship,
of singing our faith,
of moving our bodies
in praise, or dance, or postures of confession.
It can be the practice of public, prophetic witness.
It can be the practice of telling the Gospel story.
It can be the practice of confession and reconciliation.
It can be the practice of humble service and
washing the feet of another, literally or figuratively.

The more we practice the life of Christ,
the living bread,
our daily bread,
the more that life of the bread, becomes our life.
_____________________

It’s not unlike what happens
in the Jewish practice of reciting the “Shema.”

We read that this morning, just before the milestone recognitions.
Those verses are the heart of Jewish faith and identity.
Virtually every Jewish man, woman, and child
knows the original Hebrew words for the first verse of that text:
“Shema, Israel, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Echad.”
“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.”

People of Jewish faith know the words because, still today,
they are recited multiple times a day.
Getting up in the morning, going to bed at night,
as a preface to many of their prayers.
For the more devout Jews,
they are printed on paper, and rolled into tiny scrolls,
in tucked into tiny containers,
and attached to doorframes and gateposts,
and they are touched or kissed every time they are passed by.
Or they are put in leather boxes and strapped to their foreheads
or wrists while they pray.
In these practices, they follow the instructions of Moses, literally,
in Deuteronomy 6, which we read:
“Bind them as a sign on your hand,
fix them as an emblem on your forehead,
and write them on the doorposts of your house
and on your gates.”
Whether through touch, or sight, or hearing,
these words, called “The Shema,”
are served up multiple times a day.
They are eaten like bread.

The Jewish people—as a community—feast on these words.
They ingest them,
so that, like daily bread,
they are no longer merely words.
They lose their word-ness.
And take on a different form of life.
And course through their spiritual bloodstream.
The very identity of the Jewish people is wrapped up somehow
in these words.
The words become a spiritual home base.
They are words of life to them.
“Shema, Israel, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Echad.”
“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.”

Now why has seeing, touching, hearing, or speaking these words
taken on such deep significance?
Because it has become a physical practice,
a regular, purposeful, communal practice.
Every day, multiple times a day,
they are reminded who they are,
and who they belong to.

That is the way the practices of our faith should shape us.

This is a challenge for all of us,
no matter what our stage of life or our line of work.

But today, on this Back-to-School Sunday,
I want to especially challenge the students among us—
elementary, high-school, college, or graduate students.
Study your lessons hard, do the homework, learn the information,
but do not neglect the core practices of our faith.
We learn for life, when we submit both our minds and our bodies,
to formational practices.
Find some ritual . . . and stick to it . . .
whether it’s 15 minutes when you first rise in the morning,
or whether it’s reciting the Lord’s Prayer as you hustle
to your next class,
or whether it’s prioritizing time with your faith community
for worship, for prayer, for singing, for communion,
even when the work load gets heavy.
Maybe especially when the work load gets heavy.

And the rest of us can find similar ways to practice
the life of the bread of life,
no matter what our schedule, or lack thereof.
“Give us this day our daily bread.”
So that we may eat of it, and not die,
but live fully, now and eternally.

In the words of the poet Kenneth Morse,
Bread of life, whose body, broken,
feeds the hunger of my heart,
may the thanks that you have spoken
bless each loaf I break apart.

Let these hands now calmly folding
speak my gratitude for grace,
lest the treasure I am holding
disappear before my face.

Lord, I welcome you to table;
grace my supper ever new.
With your feast of love enable
every guest to live for you.

Let’s sing this poem together. #455 in the Hymnal: Worship Book.

—Phil Kniss, August 28, 2011

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Ross Erb: It's me...and me...

August 21, 2011
Luke 10:25-37 - Parable of the Good Samaritan

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:




...or download a printer-friendly PDF file: click here


...or read it online here:

So have you heard the parable about the Good Samaritan? Oh, yeah, I was afraid of that. In fact, this parable told by Jesus is one of those stories in the Bible that almost everyone has heard at least once, even if they have never been inside a church building. And if they don’t know the parable, they at least know what a good Samaritan is. The phrase “Good Samaritan” is such a common one, that when I googled it, I found 11 million references. I narrowed my search to “good Samaritan hospital” and had over 2 million references. And when I just plugged in “Samaritan” I had almost 19 million references. So I studied all of those results…ok, I didn’t.

Isn’t it amazing that Samaritan has become such a popular word? That so many benevolent agencies incorporate Samaritan into their name? It’s amazing because in the context of first century Israel, Samaritans were looked down upon and despised. But because of this passage in Luke, Samaritan, or good Samaritan, has become almost ubiquitous in our culture. I found it somewhat daunting to think about preaching on this parable that everyone is so familiar with. I don’t know that I have anything new to say about it. So I sat with the text. And what captured me in sitting with this parable was the array of characters in the story. I thought it would be interesting to look more closely at them.

I took this idea to the youth group on Wednesday evening, and asked them to help me out with my sermon. So I’m giving credit now to the youth for at least some of what is coming. By my count there are 8 characters in this parable. I’d like to look at each of them very briefly, because for me it is instructive.

First we have the expert in the law, or a lawyer, or an expert in the religious laws of Moses, who tests or tempts, or tries, Jesus with a question. I am quite puzzled by this as I try to decide whether this fellow is an honest seeker or was trying to trap Jesus with a trick question. I think you could read it either way, but on Wednesday night we were inclined to view this teacher as an honest seeker. But in Matthew 22, where this situation is referenced, the question is set in the context of the Pharisees trying to test Jesus. Jesus had just silenced the Sadducees with some skillful teaching on marriage and the resurrection. That would seem to indicate that the lawyer was trying to trap Jesus. In Mark 12 this story of a teacher of the law asking Jesus about the greatest commandment also appears. Here Jesus and the teacher seem to appreciate each other, and Jesus ends up telling the teacher “you are not far from the Kingdom of God.” That seems to suggest that perhaps the expert was truly seeking knowledge.

By asking Jesus “who is my neighbor” it may be that the lawyer was trying to make himself look good by asking a tough question. Or he may have been trying to deepen his own understanding of the commandment. We can look at this lawyer and see ourselves, sometimes trying to look smarter, sometimes having some knowledge and trying to deepen our understandings by asking tough questions. If we say “That’s me.” when we think of the lawyer, then this parable can encourage us to be honest in admitting our questions, and encourage us to continue to seek to deepen our understandings of God’s word and God’s will for our lives.

Jesus is the second person mentioned in this story. Notice that Jesus answers the questions put to him by asking other questions. Jesus is asked about what is required to receive eternal life, and he responds by asking “What is your understanding of what the law says?” Jesus is asked, “Who is my neighbor?” and responds with a story and a question. Jesus manages to get the lawyer to answer his own questions and in so doing he transforms the questions into a deeper and more honest look into God’s Kingdom. Jesus helps to move the question from “how do I get to heaven?” to “how do I live with people and reflect God to them?” It’s a bit harder to see ourselves here perhaps…the Messiah complex must need some work…but on occasion we may engage in honest inquiry with someone and allow them to take themselves into a deeper understanding of God and God’s work in the world. If we see ourselves in the role that Jesus is in here, where someone comes to us with a question, then we might learn from this parable that we do not have to provide all of the answers. Sometimes, clarifying questions and some direction are all that are needed to help. We might be more inclined to want to give quick answers, but Jesus seems to model a comfort with joining in and taking time to explore and seek. Sometimes questions are as important as answers in the journey toward God.

The traveler or victim in the story is relatively unknown. He was just heading from Jerusalem to Jericho. But he ends up lying naked and beaten and bleeding beside the road, needing assistance. While it is fairly easy to see ourselves in this character, if we think of times where we have needed help, I know that I almost never want to view myself in that context. We are supposed to be self-sufficient and able to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps! In our culture, this story would end with the victim dragging himself along after the attack, overcoming his assailants with some surprise move, and riding off with their donkeys! I’ve seen dozens of movies like that! But placing ourselves into this story as the victim highlights how much we rely on others to be God’s instruments of grace, healing and mercy. I can look at the man lying beaten by the roadside and say, “That’s me.” Can you? If we do, we can become more aware of the many times where someone reaches out to provide assistance to us, and we can express our thanks, to the good Samaritan who helps us, and to God for sending that sign of God’s loving mercy.

Perhaps a harder character, or group, to relate to is the gang of thieves. They are faceless in this story; a group of, I assume, men who hide along the road and ambush unsuspecting travelers. I have not jumped anyone recently and left them naked and bleeding, and I’ll assume you have not either. But as we talked about this in the youth group we were able to identify times where we have acted in ways that have left others hurt. It is significant that it is a group of people who attack the traveler. We often fall into a mob mentality and do things when we are with others that we would never do on our own. The youth identified that often bullying or excluding behavior is drawn out of people because they are in a group. Sometimes it is because we are a part of a larger system that we engage in practices that hurt others. How does the lifestyle we have impact others around the world? What does it mean to live in the empire of the United States and thus be complicit in the wars that this country is fighting? We may even feel powerless to stop this pattern of hurting others, sucked along by harmful practices of our group or of our country. Sometimes I am a part of the band of thieves, is that you as

well? Having that awareness can help us to step back from those situations where we are actively hurting others with our words or actions. Having that awareness can cause us to critically examine our consumption and investing to limit injustices. And having that awareness can lead us to confession and repentance. I see myself in that band of thieves, can you see yourself?

I’m going to roll the priest and the levite into one here. Both are people that you would expect to be holy. As religious people, you would expect them to stop and help out the victim. As far as we know they are “like” the victim in that they are, all there of them, Jews. Both choose to ignore the victim and walk on by. I can only understand this by thinking that they are afraid. They might be afraid that it is a trap and that they are at risk, or they might be afraid that the man is already dead and they will be considered unclean and unable to perform their duties as priest or Levite. The risk of 30 days without being able to work is formidable. So, most of us would find it very easy to see ourselves here. We don’t want to get involved in a situation, we don’t know what to do, we fear the possible repercussions, what will people think? And while in Luke the parable is neat and clean, life is seldom that way. Do we let ourselves be immobilized by fear, doubt, and uncertainty, maybe even crass self-interest? How do we respond when we are asked by someone on the street for some spare change? I know that Phil and Barbara and I struggle when someone arrives at church asking for assistance with rent or utilities, or is traveling through and needs gas money. Sometimes it is easier to try to avoid the hassle of dealing with those who are hurting or marginalized. Sometimes it is easier to judge them as “deserving” of what they are experiencing. Oh, I can definitely see myself in the shoes of the priest and the Levite. Can you? Again, this awareness can lead to confession and repentance, and a move toward active and creative engagement.

I’ll skip the good Samaritan to cover the last character, the innkeeper. Interestingly, a number of our youth identified with the innkeeper. They see themselves minding their own business and not being around trouble. But when someone comes to them and asks them to help out, to provide care or hospitality, they are quick to do so. It might be a more passive role in this story, but it is still a very important one. I can see myself in this role, I can see our congregation in this role, quick to respond when a need is presented, ready to offer care and hospitality when asked. Maybe this is simply an extension of the good Samaritan, a partner in the loving response to the victim. Can you see yourself in the innkeeper?

And that brings us to the good Samaritan. To him, the victim is an “other”. There is a traditional enmity and distrust between their two groups. We often make distinctions about others and allow that to divide us. Jesus references this tendency in Mark 9, this time in response to a question from John. You know the quote… “whoever isn’t for us is against us” right? President George W. Bush made that quote quite famous. I hasten to say that I don’t mean to be overly critical of President Bush, as his comment is only a reflection of much of the thinking in our society. But you will notice that he, like I just did, misquoted Jesus. In Mark 9:40, what Jesus says is, “…for whoever is not against us is for us.” It is a dramatic shift, just that slight change in the quote. One assumes an enemy, “whoever is not for us is against us”, the other assumes a friend, “whoever is not

against us if for us”. The good Samaritan sees with God’s eyes when he looks at the man lying naked and bleeding on the road, and steps in with compassion. He ignores the dangers to himself, he doesn’t worry about what others think, isn’t deterred by the financial cost. He isn’t just doing something to stop the bleeding, as it were, but he makes a long term commitment to bring healing. A friend shared with me about a time he intervened in a conflict. It worked out well. A woman was saved from a dangerous situation, and people commended him for his actions. But he had a young woman with him at the time, and he realized that by intervening he had put her at some risk. If she had been injured, would people have still commended him for acting? He said that he weighed this but the overwhelming need drove him to act. Sometimes I assess my actions and I feel good, knowing that I have acted selflessly on behalf of others. Corporately, an example that comes to my mind is our relationship with Christian Baptist Church in New Orleans, where we are walking alongside of them, helping them to rebuild their church and their community while learning to know them and being shaped by what they share with us. We became aware of their situation and stepped in to help. So the good Samaritan is also me, and you.

I think it is helpful to look closely at the characters who populate Jesus’ stories. We can learn about ourselves, learn to shift who we are as we study them. I want us to shift more and more to be like the good Samaritan in how we think about neighbor. That means pushing ourselves to see with God’s eyes those around us. It means entering into relationship with people not at all like us. And it may mean pushing to extract ourselves from systems that cause us to be a part of a band of thieves. That is a harder task. Martin Luther King in “A time to break silence” develops the call of Christ to society at large:

“On the one hand we are called to play the good Samaritan on life’s roadside; but that will be only an initial act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life’s highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring”.

Perhaps we can all move further along in our attempts to see this world through God’s eyes, as the good Samaritan did, and truly love our neighbor as we love ourselves, and as we love God. There is a song in Sing the Journey, # 62, that encourages us in this manner. Christ’s is the world in which we move, Christ’s are the folks we’re summoned to love, Christ’s is the voice which calls us to care, and Christ is the one who meets us here. To the lost Christ shows his face; to the un-loved he gives his embrace; to those who cry in pain or disgrace, Christ makes, with his friends (with us) a touching place. Let us sing together # 62 in Sing the Journey.

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Phil Kniss (and others): Epistles, Prayers, Preachers and Parables: Words for the Church

August 14, 2011
2 Corinthians 5:16-20; Matthew 7:24-27

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:




...or read it online here:

In the next 25-30 minutes, we’re going to hear words for the church
coming out of the two recent assemblies we’ve participated in—
the Mennonite Church USA biennial convention
in Pittsburgh, July 3-9,
and the Virginia Mennonite annual conference
here in our neighborhood July 21-24.

These words for the church will be in the form of
Epistles, Prayers, Preachers and Parables

We’ll begin with a reading from Paul’s epistle to the church in Corinth,
the theme text for our week in Pittsburgh.

Then we’ll have a section of prayers for MCUSA.

Then we are going to get just a taste
of some of the preaching that happened in Pittsburgh.
I chose five of the preachers and put together
small video samples of their messages,
all growing out of the theme text, 2 Cor. 5,
and all about crossing bridges and reconciliation.

You will hear, in order . . .

Shane Hipps—one of the teaching pastors
at a megachurch called Mars Hill Bible Church,
and a former Mennonite pastor from Phoenix—
in the opening joint youth and adult worship,
urging MCUSA to practice the ministry of reconcilation
as a higher calling than the pursuit of either justice or purity.

Next, Madeline Maldonado, a pastor with her husband David
of an Hispanic Mennonite church in Fort Myers, FL,
tells her story of healing from an abusive childhood.

Then Bishop Danisa Ndlovu, from Zimbabwe,
president of Mennonite World Conference,
calls the church to begin the ministry of reconciliation
within the family of faith.

Then, Ted Swartz, an actor/comedian from this community
speaks to the youth about his journey of healing and reconciliation
after his long-time acting and business partner Lee Eshleman
took his own life several years ago.
Ted compares this to the story of Jacob and Esau’s reconciliation.

Finally, Ervin Stutzman,
who could have given his sermon in person this morning,
but instead will have to listen to what’s left of it
after I chopped it down to two minutes.
In it he passionately implores the church
to be reconciled to God,
so that we can be ambassadors of reconciliation.

After these sermon clips,
we move to Virginia Mennonite Conference.
Beginning with the reading of today’s parable from Matthew 7,
about building houses on rock or sand.
The focus of Conference this year was on the practices of the church
which will carry us forward into the future,
after a year of celebrating 175 years of history.
This parable is about practicing our faith,
as Jesus compared the two builders
to people who either acted on his teaching,
or did not act on his teaching.

Then, prayers for Virginia Mennonite Conference.

Then, we’ll conclude with some words for the church
that I gave at the closing joint worship service
a couple weeks ago held at EMU.

So, without further announcement,
let’s enter into this period of listening to words for the church—
epistles, prayers, preachers, and parables.

Words from Paul: 2 Corinthians 5:16-20

Words from PVMCers: prayers for Mennonite Church USA
(sung response: HWB 353 Lord, Listen to your children praying)
Peyton Erb, Millard Showalter, Lisa Mast, Virginia Spicher, Ervin Stutzman, Annika Maust

Words from Pittsburgh preachers: Shane Hipps, Madeline Maldonado, Danisa Ndlovu, Ted Swartz, Ervin Stutzman

Words from a Parable of Jesus: Matthew 7:24-27

Words from PVMCers: prayers for Virginia Mennonite Conference
(sung response: HWB 353 Lord, Listen to your children praying)
LeVon Smoker, Gloria Diener, John Lehman

Words from Pastor Phil: Thoughts on a “practicing church”

I am not afraid for the future of the church.
I am thrilled to be part of the church of Jesus Christ
in this post-Christian culture.
Every poll paints a dire picture of declining attendance
and diminishing loyalty to the church.
Denominations are running back to the drawing board,
scratching their heads,
wringing their hands (in desperate prayer?)
and coming up with new plans and strategies and programs
to return the church to its glory days.
But I am not afraid for the church.

I see Christians from every tradition, including Anabaptist,
returning to their roots (being radical).
They are rediscovering that the heart of church
is living out their faith in covenant communities of disciples
who participate in God’s saving mission in the world.
They are rediscovering the ancient practices
that formed communities of Christians since the book of Acts.

They gather in groups small enough to sit around tables
and break bread together
and know each other deeply.
They practice the life of Christ together,
and take it into their neighborhoods and into the larger world.
They worship together,
discern together,
study scripture and pray together.
In the daily rhythms of their lives they embody God’s reign
wherever they are.
They know that simply attending church,
sitting in rows,
and listening to 20-minute monologues,
will not form true disciples of Jesus.

So they join in communities to practice the life of Christ.
I have great hope in the transforming power of the Holy Spirit
to turn a small group of seriously flawed human beings
into the means by which God brings about
his saving and reconciling mission.

I don’t know what this means for the church as we know it,
or for the institutions that hold that church together.
The church is being marginalized in our culture.
But guess what?
Whenever the church is shoved to the margins, it thrives.

It happened to the church in the first three centuries,
to the 16th-century Anabaptists,
to Christians in Ethiopia in the 70s and 80s.
The church thrives because it can’t depend on the surrounding culture
to prop it up.
It has to lean hard on the Holy Spirit and each other.

The church won’t thrive by God swooping in to forcibly resuscitate it.
It will thrive when it engages in practices that create openings for God.
Life comes from God alone.
But God’s life flows into and through us only as
we purposefully create openings for it.
That’s what Christian practices do—create openings for God to act.

Will the Virginia Conference of the next 175 years
look like it does today?
Will it have a substantial headquarters
and staff and budget and programs?
I don’t know.
But I do know that if we keep proclaiming Christ as Lord,
if we keep leaning on the Holy Spirit,
if we keep gathering at each others’ tables
to nurture the ancient practices of the church . . .
Mennonite-Anabaptist Christians will, in fact,
be alive and well and engaged together
in God’s saving mission in our neighborhood,
and around the world.

I do not fear for the church.
Rather, I joyfully seek to imagine and embrace God’s future
for God’s people—
in authentic community and mission,
practicing the life of Christ in the world.

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Barbara Moyer Lehman: Grumbling or gratitude?

August 7, 2011
Matthew 20:1-16 -- Parable of the Generous Landowner

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:




Grumbling is contagious! Pastor Barbara Moyer Lehman recounted some recent instances where she heard, and even participated in, grumbling. she then reminded us of Paul's words in Philippians 2:14 to "do everything without grumbling". In Matthew 20:1-16, Jesus tells a parable of workers who grumble about how the landowner pays them. Pastor Barbara said this parable is not about how to run a business. The focus should be on the generosity of the landowner, who operates based on grace rather than merit. In this perspective we get a glimpse into the Kingdom of Heaven, into the nature of God. God provides for the daily needs of those in the Kingdom. God's grace and generosity are not based on how hard or long we work, or our education, or resources. God, like the landowner, is interested in providing for everyone, and is persistent in seeking us out. Recognizing this, can we live as though grace and freedom reign, and live with generosity rather than grumbling?

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]