Sunday, September 26, 2010

Phil Kniss: From Shame to Shalom

September 26, 2010
"What's the gospel word on pornographic culture?"
Genesis 1:26-27, 31; John 8:2-11; 1 John 4:7-12, 18-21

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:

Powered by Podbean.com

...or download a printer-friendly PDF file: click here


...or read it online here:

This is a sermon for everyone here. Everyone.

I’m guessing that, when you saw in the schedule
I would be addressing pornography today,
you may have come with certain expectations . . . or hopes . . .
of what I might focus on in this short sermon.

You may have come expecting a sermon
that strongly condemns the commercial pornography industry,
and the damage it has done to individuals and society.
You will get that kind of sermon . . . in part.
You may have come expecting me to directly challenge
those who have succumbed to the sin
of consuming this commercial pornography—
on the internet, in magazines, videos, and other media.
You will get that kind of sermon . . . in part.
But you may, or may not, have expected a sermon
that is aimed primarily and directly
at everyone of us in this room, myself included,
and the role we play in developing a pornographic culture,
and encouraging it to thrive.
We are all complicit,
in that we actively participate in a culture
where our attitudes toward human nature, sexuality,
relationships, and God,
have made the pornography industry
a natural, and predictable, result.

Let me first talk about the industry itself.
The producers of all this raunch.
Pornography. The word itself is informative.
“Porno-” is from the Greek word for prostitute.
“-graph,” of course, is from the word for writing.
Writing about prostitutes.
If prostitution is, as they say, the “world’s oldest profession,”
then writing about it must be the second-oldest profession.
So from ancient times—in the only media available at the time—
there has been a market for detailed, explicit descriptions,
and drawings,
about what normally takes place in private.
Why? Because people wanted
the thrill of observation without participation.
They wanted the pleasure, without the cost.
Actual participation is too costly—
financial, socially, relationally.
So it’s really nothing new—
this disconnection of sex from relationship.

What separates the old days from these days,
is not the basic concept.
It’s the big business it has become.
Technology has steadily progressed,
from text and line-drawings,
to black-and-white photography,
to moving pictures,
glossy full-color magazines,
video-tape,
digital images,
and now the internet.
With the coming of each new invention,
the early adopters always included pornographers,
because there was money to be made.

What makes our situation unprecedented,
is that with the internet,
the amount of money to be made is astounding,
because of how cheap it is to publish electronically,
and because of how vast and easily accessible the users,
who no longer need to duck into back alleys
in seedy parts of town,
and find places to hide the material at home.
They can do it privately, secretly,
and if they know enough about internet security,
they can do it without ever being discovered.
They can, and do, visit these sites at home, and at work . . .
in government offices,
in schools,
in libraries,
and yes, in churches.

You’ve heard the statistics, and they are truly alarming.
Statistics are always a bit slippery, of course,
and especially on this subject,
we can’t be scientifically precise.
But let’s say these numbers are at least somewhere in the ballpark.
Pornography revenue in the United States alone,
is greater than the combined revenues of ABC, CBS, and NBC.
More than 1 in 10 of every website in the world,
is pornographic.
People today Google almost everything, constantly.
Still, 25% of requests on internet search engines,
are for pornography.
Christians are not immune.
The Barna Research Group found that
35% of Christian men, and 17% of Christian women,
reported using pornography in the last month.
Christianity Today, in a 2000 study,
found that 37% of pastors described pornography
as a “current struggle.”
Our youth are particularly vulnerable.
Statistics show the average age—average—
of someone’s first exposure to internet porn is age 11.
90% of persons age 8-16 have viewed online pornography,
most while doing homework.

Suffice it to say,
the pornography industry, in the internet age,
is pervasive, and hugely profitable.

And what about the users?
Pornography addiction is widespread.
It has destroyed marriages.
It has ruined careers.
It has psychologically wounded countless children and youth.
It has incited acts of violence and oppression,
especially toward women and children.
Pornography addiction is present in the church.
If statistics hold true,
I’m speaking to dozens of pornography addicts right now,
in this room.
Some of you have spoken to me about your struggle.
Many of you, I would guess, have never spoken to anyone about it.
We, the church, need to be a place where wounded persons
can safely come for healing,
no matter the nature of the wound.

My solemn pledge to you this morning is this:
If you struggle with this addiction,
and have the courage to come to me and break your silence,
I promise complete confidentiality,
and, if you want,
I will make it possible for you to meet and talk with
others who are actively overcoming
the same addiction.
_____________________

But as I said earlier,
this sermon is not only directed toward
the major producers and consumers
of commercial pornography.
It would be easy for the church to get on its high horse,
as it often has done,
and wag its fingers at Playboy and Hustler and their kind,
and condemn the dreadful sinners who look at their garbage.
There’s no question.
Producing and viewing pornography is sinful.
And sin requires repentance, and turning.
But if we stop there,
and never ask the “why” questions,
never ask the “how-did-we-get-to-this-point” questions,
we’re wasting our time.

So, why is pornography wrong?
Some people try to argue that dabbling in a little porn
is harmless recreation,
it doesn’t hurt anyone else,
it releases pent-up sexual energy,
that might otherwise be expressed in more harmful ways.
There’s a rather obvious flaw in that argument.
When someone buys and uses pornography, in any form,
there are many others directly involved in that transaction.
Everyone in present and future relationships with that user,
who will suffer from that user’s emotional wounds,
including low self-esteem,
and distorted attitudes about sexuality.
And who knows how many people have been oppressed,
humiliated, shamed, enslaved, and abused . . .
somewhere in the business chain,
of producing, manufacturing, distributing, and selling.

But all that pales in comparison to a systemic and pervasive sin,
in which we all participate, as a people, as a society.
And it’s a sin of the first order.
Because it’s a sin that’s at the root of,
that cultivates and nourishes the sin of pornography,
and so many other human practices that offend God.
_____________________

So this is where we turn to the scriptures
to listen for the gospel word.
This is where we ponder the question,
“How does the gospel speak?”
What are the larger issues at stake here,
that get to the core of the gospel,
the center of our calling as people of God,
our identity as followers of Jesus,
as citizens and subjects of God’s reign in this world?
Our lives should be shaped first and foremost
by the good news that we are God’s people,
that God in Christ loves and saves and redeems us
for God’s good purposes in this world.

You may not have thought of the scriptures you heard this morning
as being anti-porn scriptures.
Not much specific to sexual immorality, or impure thoughts,
or the like.

But these are formational scriptures.
They position us.
They clarify our identity.
Let’s review.

Genesis 1 and 2 tell the story of creation.
We were reminded in the reading today,
that on the sixth day, God did the crowning work of creation,
the work that caused God to finally exclaim,
“This is very good!”
God said, “Let us make humankind in our image,
according to our likeness . . .
So God created humankind in his image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.”
And God said, “This is very good.”

Chapter 2, although we didn’t read it,
gives another angle on the story.
God saw it was not good for the man to be alone,
so was looking for a suitable partner.
Finding none, God formed a woman from the man’s rib.
God breathed life into her.
Presented her to the man.
And the man was beside himself with joy!
Jubilant at this intimate connection with another.
The man exclaimed, “YES!
Bone of my bones!” “Flesh of my flesh!”

And Creator God says, “YES! This is very good!
This is what I want! This is what I love.
Men and women together, in wholeness, in unity,
freely reflecting my image,
in its beauty and diversity.
A picture of shalom and joy and sheer delight.
And, by the way, they were both naked, and not ashamed.

It didn’t last.
This shame-less shalom came to a quick end.
When humankind veered away from God’s purposes,
we started making gods of ourselves and our desires.
Delight turned to desire.
Giddy joy in the other faded,
and was overshadowed by a self-oriented desire
to satisfy our own appetites.
_____________________

Then John 8. A famous gospel story.
It involves sexual sin—adultery, not pornography.
A group of religious people, wanting to test Jesus,
physically brought him a woman
who had been caught in the very act of the sin,
who deserved, according to the law, to be stoned to death.
They asked Jesus, what shall we do with this sinful woman?
Jesus defused the situation, not by excusing the sin,
but by putting the sin in a larger context.
“Whoever is without sin, throw the first stone.”

I think Jesus was saying, something’s missing in this picture.
They were all pointing to this woman,
saying, “Here is the sin that needs to be dealt with!”
But this was not just the sin of one isolated individual.
Other sinners were involved here.
And they all lived in a community of inter-connected sinners,
each blind to their own complicity in the sin,
and self-righteously pointing at the easy target.

Sin takes root and grows not just in the heart of an individual.
It grows in a social context.
In a culture that has lost its way.
The sins of the community, and the sins of the individual,
can never be separated.
That is nowhere more true than with the sin of pornography.
_____________________

What it all boils down to is this.
Pornography is a predictable outcome
of our shared rejection of the biblical vision.
Pornography is a natural result
of our human attempt to undo God’s good work.

The biblical vision is that human beings
are the crowning act of God’s creation,
that we were created in love,
in whole and free relationship to each other,
in whole and free relationship to God.

The human experience in this world is to be, by God’s design,
an invitation into covenant, into community,
into shared, mutually sacrificial love.

Our culture vehemently works against that.
In our culture, sexual relationships are governed by consent,
not by covenant.
We are fast losing the concept that there is more at stake,
in our sexual behavior,
than the private desires of consenting adults.
God invites us into a comprehensive covenant.
One that shapes the whole human experience.
We are invited to live as one of God’s people,
within whose boundaries we find
our greatest freedom
and highest joy.

We know from the beginning of Genesis, and through all of scripture,
that it is relationship, not independence,
that characterizes the good life—the very good human life.
But this relatedness to the other—
core to our nature, and part of the divine image—
is pushed aside as old-fashioned and irrelevant,
by a culture that has successfully separated sex from relationship.

This non-relational view of sex is absolutely pervasive,
in our every-day life—even without pornography.

Beginning early,
often innocently and unwittingly,
we are training our children and youth to objectify the body,
to make the body, and specific parts thereof,
little more than objects of desire.
We ascribe worth to each other
by the shape of our anatomy.
And we call attention to certain parts of our body,
by the clothes we choose to wear . . . or not wear.

And we don’t need Bible-thumping, right-wing,
Christian reactionaries to tell us this is happening.

A few years ago the “liberal” American Psychological Association
formed a task force on the sexualization of young girls,
and found a pervasive culture pattern at work.

Even parents contribute to their girls’ sexualization,
they found,
by obsessing on their daughters’ physical appearance,
and by the products they allow, or encourage,
their children to buy.

The study mentions Bratz dolls, hugely popular among young girls.
Targeted for children age 8 and up,
Bratz dolls, the report said,
are marketed in bikinis, sitting in a hot tub,
mixing drinks, and standing around,
while the boy dolls play guitar,
and stand with their surf boards, poised for action.
Other Bratz dolls come dressed in highly sexualized clothing—
fishnet stockings, see-through miniskirts, and feather boas.

The study cited thongs—
undergarments that originated with strippers—
being marketed to children, sized for 7- to 10-year-olds,
some printed with slogans such as “wink-wink.”

The study criticizes teen magazines aimed at girls 11 and up
for being full of alluring ads depicting young women
in the kind of bodily posture or facial expression
that implies sexual readiness.
_____________________

We live in a culture of sexually-saturated media.
And nearly all the sexual images are reductionist.
That is, they reduce God’s good gift to something cheap.
They take the inestimable worth and beauty
and complex sexuality of the human being
created in the image of a loving, relational God,
and reduce it to a less-than-human object
to be used for someone else’s cheap and temporary pleasure.
No wonder there is such a strong correlation
between pornography and sexual violence.
Once we accept that another human being
can be a legitimate object for our use,
we open the door to all kinds of domination
and violent oppression.

Meanwhile, almost all of us, without giving a second thought,
partake of mainstream popular media every day,
sometimes for hours.
Especially television,
but so many other forms,
from magazines in waiting rooms,
to billboards, movies, smart phones, and internet.

But if we stop and think honestly about it,
we will have to admit there is not really a sharp dividing line
that separates the reductionist images of sexuality
we consume every day
from the images being sold as hard-core pornography.

Clearly, they are at different points on a continuum.
But they are on the same continuum.
They all take God’s great gift of human intimacy and sexuality—
the gift that made Adam joyfully shout,
“Bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh!”—
the gift of being able to passionately cherish and connect with
the wholeness of one’s partner in covenant—
they all take that gift and tragically reduce it,
cheapen it,
demean, degrade, and exploit it for almost any purpose,
other than the covenant love for which it was intended.

At the hard-core end of the continuum, the degradation is obvious.
And we rather self-righteously condemn it.
At other points on the continuum,
we shrug.
Or we wink and smile.
Or we say, “Cool!”
and plunk down the cash for whatever they’re selling.

What a tragedy!
That is the systemic, societal sin in which we all participate.
The rejection of God’s good gift of wholeness,
and opting for fragmentation.
The rejection of God’s shalom, embodied in creation,
and exchanging it for a shameful illusion.
The rejection of God’s covenant love,
and pursuing instead our personal fleeting pleasure.

But the gospel word remains.
God still loves, with a steadfast, unchanging love
for his good creation,
God still extends the offer of forgiveness and redemption.
God is ready to re-make the covenant.
We can move from shame back to shalom.

But it will take concerted effort on our part
to overcome the damage already done to our thinking.
We will have to be re-sensitized.

Perhaps that might happen if we
(1) Develop the habit of critical thinking
(2) Develop deeper Christian community, and
(3) Celebrate and cherish the gift of covenant love.

We should pay careful attention
whenever we see or interact with any media,
or whenever we walk through any shopping establishment
We should think critically, ask thoughtful questions,
of ourselves, and of any children or youth who might be with us.
Like,
“I wonder what message that picture is trying to get across?”

We must not take on this battle alone.
We must immerse ourselves in the kind of community
that can effectively reshape our thinking.
And I don’t mean attending church at least 2-3 times a month.
It will take exponentially more than that
to counter our over-sexualized culture.

And we must, above all,
celebrate, and cherish, and glory in,
the unconditional love that God extends to us,
and invites us to reflect, in all our relationships.

This morning we heard the writer of 1 John say,
“Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God.”
“God is love.”

Let us bask in that covenant love of God,
let us rest our weary souls in that healing love.
There is forgiveness. There is restoration.

Let us turn to HWB 577, and meditate on these words,
O love that will not let me go,
I rest my weary soul in Thee.
I give Thee back the life I owe,
That in thine ocean depths
its flow may richer, fuller be.

—Phil Kniss, September 26, 2010

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Mark Thiessen Nation: For God so loved the world: On becoming a Baptist pacifist

September 19, 2010
John 3:16; Romans 12:1-2; Matthew 5:43-48

In 1970, at the age of 17, Mark Thiessen Nation became a Christian and became a member of the local Baptist church. Through listening to his pastor’s evangelistic sermons Mark came to understand John 3:16, came to understand that God loved the whole world. Through the next year, Mark came to believe that in good conscience he could not go to the war in Vietnam. When it came time to register for the draft, Mark wrote an essay based on Matthew 5:43-49 to explain why he could not go to war. Mark shared with the congregation his development into a pacifist, and went on to challenge some of the back-tracking from pacifism that he perceives in parts of the Mennonite church today. The call of Christ to love our enemies is as relevant today as it was 2000 years ago.

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:
[coming soon]

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Phil Kniss: God is Greater!

September 12, 2010
"What's the gospel word on Christian-Muslim relations?
Genesis 17:1-6; 22:17-18; John 4:19-24


Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:

Powered by Podbean.com

...or download a printer-friendly PDF file: click here


...or read it online here:
It might be important to note
that this sermon was planned quite a while ago.
Well before the threatened Qu’ran burning fiasco.
Well before the frankly, shameful, public media storm
that actively aided a handful of disturbed, fear-driven people
who claim to follow Jesus,
in my former hometown of Gainesville, FL,
to broadcast their hateful, judgmental, and deeply offensive
words and images to the whole world,
paid in full by corporate media.

But the timing of this sermon was not a coincidence.
It comes on 9/12/2010,
one day after the anniversary of the event
that has for the past nine years, so deeply defined and shaped
the state of Christian-Muslim relations in the Western world.
And these relations are, it could be argued,
at one of the lowest points since the Crusades.

We desperately need to hear a Gospel Word on this subject.
We need to stop, and take a deep breath,
maybe a dozen deep breaths,
and listen, in quietness, to what the Gospel has to say
about how followers of Jesus relate to those of Islamic faith.
This is a very specific sermon.
This is not a lecture on the principles of interfaith relations
in general.
Although maybe some of what you hear could apply.
This is an in-house conversation among Christians,
focused on the narrow question of our posture toward Muslims.
And this is the kind of conversation we need right now, I think.
The conversations happening in surrounding society
are driven by anger, by fear, by prejudice,
by misinformation and grandstanding.
They are driven by political agendas left, right, and moderate.
Frankly, I am disappointed by nearly all of them.
First, we Christians need a conversation among ourselves,
driven not by politics, but by the Gospel.
Then we might start to have a clue how to converse
with our neighbors who adhere to the faith called Islam.

So let us this morning tune our ears to a gospel word.
A gospel word, as I’m using it, is a word of good news
that sheds light on the core nature and character of God,
and shows us how to relate to this God and to each other
in a way that makes a good life possible.
The scriptures we heard this morning do that, I believe.
So let’s remind ourselves what we heard.

From Genesis 17 and 22,
we heard of God’s attempt to form a people through Abraham.
God entered into a formal covenant
with Abraham and with all of Abraham’s descendants.
And remember, Islam also looks to Abraham
as a father of their faith.
Mohammed, and most people of Arab ancestry,
are believed to be descended from Abraham’s son Ishmael,
through Hagar.

Parenthesis. Right off the bat, let me be clear about something.
There are Christians who say that Allah,
the God worshiped by Muslims,
is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob . . . and Jesus.
Well, first, let’s point out the obvious.
Allah is simply the Arabic word for “God,”
like El is the Hebrew word for “God.”
The word El occurred several times in today’s Genesis reading.
Furthermore, the Qu’ran clearly identifies Allah
as the same God of the Jews and Christians.
Let me quote from an English translation of the Qu’ran,
from the second Surah, v. 136:
We believe in God (Allah), and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them: And we bow in submission to God (Allah).”
Muslims believe that God has revealed himself truthfully,
through Abraham, and both his sons,
and the prophets descended from them,
including Moses and Jesus.
They make no distinction.
They submit to God who reveals himself through them all.

So asking whether we worship the same God,
is not a helpful question. It’s too simplistic.
The real question is,
“What kind of God is revealed in Islam, and in Christianity?”
How is that revelation the same? and how is it different?
We’ll get to that in a minute.

So back to Genesis.
God is here revealed as a covenant-maker.
God wants to be in covenant with a particular people
so that God might bless all the peoples of the earth.
God wants all his people to be a fruitful blessing
for the benefit of all creation,
to work with God in restoring the goodness,
the wholeness, the shalom, salaam . . . peace
that the world had before the rebellion, and fall.

And then, in today’s Gospel reading from John 4
Jesus reinforced this notion
that God has love and compassion
for all nations and peoples,
and is not confined to any one humanly-constructed
religion and its own holy places and holy rituals.
The day is coming, said Jesus to the woman at the well,
when faithfulness to God is not defined by
whether we worship in Jerusalem, in the temple,
in accordance with the rituals of Jewish religion,
or on a mountain, or in some other place and tradition.
What will matter, Jesus said,
is whether we worship in spirit, and in truth.
That is, whether our offering of ourselves to God,
is done in a way that honors the spirit, the character,
the essence of God,
and whether it is done truthfully, with integrity.
God is the all-powerful creator of the universe
and seeks our loyalty, our undivided worship,
and demands truthful integrity from us.
_____________________

Those are the gospel words for Christians today.
Non-negotiable words about God and about true religion.

Everything about our religion must be in line with God’s purposes
for the peace, wholeness, healing, and redemption of all creation.
God’s agenda must be our agenda, always.
Our religion must always call us toward covenant with,
and toward complete obedience to,
the one, and only, and great God
who deserves our undivided loyalty.
And our worship, our prayers, our religious life and practices,
must be true to, and consistent with,
the character and spirit of God,
who we understand most fully in Jesus Christ.

It seems to me, as followers of Jesus,
as people who claim the name Christian,
that is one place we can stand
without apology, without hesitation.

But of course, this brings us to another question.
How does standing in that place
affect how we relate to those who order their lives
around the teachings of Islam?

I don’t have the time, or the expertise,
to do a complete comparative study of Islam and Christianity,
but let me briefly point out what I understand
are some significant points where we come together,
and where we diverge.

Both Christianity and Islam teach us to worship God
as Creator of the Universe,
as a Supreme Lord,
and as a judge enthroned above all creation.
Both our traditions hold that God reveals himself
through prophets, and the community of faith.
[And remember, Muslims see Jesus as one of those prophets,
just not higher than the others, nor divine.]
Both share common religious themes of
forgiveness from God,
extending forgiveness to each other,
and submitting our lives to the one great God.
There are even some specific teachings in the Qu’ran and our Bible
that are similar, in regard to prayer, fasting, and family.

One of the major ways Christians and Muslims part ways,
in our understanding of God,
is the matter of God’s relational nature.
To oversimplify,
Christianity begins with “God is love.”
Islam begins with “God is one.”
To start with “God is love,”
is to affirm that God actively participates with us,
relates to us,
chooses to be closely involved in our world,
and in our life experience.
In Islam, God dwells fully beyond the limits of human comprehension,
and our capacity to interact with God.
Where Christianity calls persons
to enter into a loving covenant relationship with God,
Islam calls persons to assume a proper position
of reverent worship and obedient submission
before God’s will and revelation.

Those are significant differences.
And there are many more, if we take time to listen and learn.
But that does not mean we Christians stand here
over against our Muslim neighbors,
and say to them “our God” is true,
and “your God” is false.

We actually have much to gain from their view of God.
We have something to learn about reverence,
about how to approach a holy and powerful and just God,
about how to order our lives around submission to God’s will.
And, of course, we say they have much to gain
by opening themselves to a fuller understanding
of God’s relational nature,
and by realizing that God reaches out, through Jesus,
to restore a broken and estranged relationship with humanity.

We do have differences that actually get to the heart of the matter,
in terms of our understanding of salvation, and grace,
and the nature of Jesus Christ, on whom our salvation rests.
Our two faiths diverge on critical points.

But again, how do we approach dialogue with Muslims?
What is the purpose of talking with them,
and what is the best method to achieve that purpose?
I said earlier I have been mostly disappointed
with the nature of the dialogue
all along the political and theological spectrum—
right, left, and middle.
I think we’re missing it on so many fronts.

Again, let me overgeneralize a little. Well, maybe a lot.
For many Christians on the right,
the only reason to talk to Muslims,
is to convince them to give up Islam and convert to Christianity.
So they argue a lot, and listen very little.
For many Christians on the left,
it’s all about listening, and very little engagement on theology.
Tolerance is everything, so they don’t dare push any points,
even if they had any points to push.
But no, “Everyone has a different way to God,
and each way is as good as the next way.
Let’s all be friends.”
And moderate Christians
might recognize the significant theological difference,
but avoiding conflict is the main point, isn’t it?
So if we must talk to our Muslim neighbors,
at least we can avoid talking about religion.
Even talking food is a little dicey.
Sports, maybe.

I’ve grown weary of public speech between Christians and Muslims
that’s either hate-filled bullying each other,
or polite, politically-correct, non-speech
that doesn’t take us anywhere useful.

Not long ago, I heard a speech by a Mennonite church leader—
one actually involved in some very fruitful, substantive,
and respectful dialogue with conservative Muslims in Iran—
and he said he was told by an Iranian Muslim cleric,
“I can have much better conversations with a Christian
who believes in their own faith strong enough,
that they try to convince me to become Christian.”

Almost by definition,
Good dialogue with opposing parties
happens when we put our most deeply held beliefs
out in the open, on the table,
and actively defend those beliefs in a respectful mutual struggle.
Then we are most likely to be heard and respected by our opponent.

Isn’t the point of inter-religious dialogue
spiritual growth?
getting closer to the truth?
going deeper in our understanding of God?
Isn’t that also the point of evangelism?
helping others discover deeper truths about God,
and going deeper in understanding and commitment?

But no one will move off square one—either Christian or Muslim—
if all we can do is, on the one hand,
politely tolerate, without ever engaging each other,
or on the other hand,
shout religious slogans and do physical violence,
or religious violence to each other.

We see the violent side every time we glance at the news,
since the press loves to give lots of air-time
to fundamentalist extremists, both Christian and Muslim.

But polite, quiet mutual tolerance
that never gets to the heart of our differences,
is not only utterly boring conversation,
it’s not helpful in the least,
it will not move us forward in faith and understanding.

So I call on us, the church,
to be the church,
be the bearers of the good news
of God’s love and mercy and justice
that we come to know in Jesus Christ.
Let us boldly articulate our faith.
And engage the other with deep respect,
and fully expect them to do the same.

Because devoted Muslims are also “evangelical” . . .
in the generic sense of the word.
They would like others come to believe and practice the good news
of a life lived in submission to the one God who is great.
They would have us repent of our materialistic ways in the west,
and our immodest and pleasure-seeking
and over-sexualized lifestyle.
They would that we should not be so indifferent and casual
about God’s laws.
They would have us take on a more reverent and submissive posture
toward the great God of the universe.
In their prayers, multiple times a day,
they proclaim the greatness of God.
“Allahu Akbar!” which means, literally, “God is greater!”
That phrase, deeply ingrained in the prayer life of every Muslim—
every peace-seeking, practicing Muslim—
is only known to us, unfortunately,
because it’s also a battle cry of the violent extremists,
when they are taking a plane down,
or setting off a suicide bomb.
But that phrase is actually repeated many times a day,
by peaceable, devout, practicing Muslims
who are our neighbors in Harrisonburg, and U.S. citizens.
“Allahu Akbar!” they say. “God is greater!”

Even that prayer phrase,
if we can get past its distorted association with terrorism,
could be one of the spiritual gifts we could receive from Muslims,
if we dared to engage them, and their faith,
with courage, and substance, and honesty.

Yes, we have good news to share with them, as well.
There is good news for all humanity
in God’s everlasting covenant love toward us,
revealed through God’s Son, Jesus Christ.
Let no Christian claim that we don’t have any
“evangelical” mission before us in our relationships with Muslims.
If we don’t have any good news worth sharing with Muslims,
we don’t have any good news worth sharing with anyone.
We don’t have any good news worth holding as our own.
Some people have a bad taste in their mouth for the word
“evangelical” because of its association
with some highly distasteful expressions of Christian faith.
“Evangelical” literally means “characterized by good news.”
That ought to describe us.

If we don’t have any good news that transforms us
into passionate people of a living faith,
we are not likely to be respected by Muslims
who have oriented their whole lives, and daily rhythms,
around devotion to, and submission to,
the One God who is greater than everything!

Of course, the sharing of our good news with someone,
needs to be accompanied by a willingness to listen deeply,
and learn from them.

Evangelical faith is compassionate faith.
It is active faith that engages the other deeply,
respectfully, and at their point of need.
That’s what Menno Simons said.
“True evangelical faith cannot lie dormant.
It clothes the naked, it comforts the sorrowful” etc.

I would love to have an opportunity to return to Gainesville, FL,
and share the good news of a grace-filled, joy-filled life in Jesus,
with Rev. Terry Jones.
I don’t think he knows or understands Jesus.
I think he must harbor some deep fears and anxieties,
he must be grieving some terrible losses.
I wish I had the chance to share my “evangelical faith” with him.
Of course, I would have to do a lot of listening,
to get to that point.
_____________________

God is greater!
Allahu Akbar! God is greater than any human barrier we construct.
God can break down walls caused by hatred, fear, anger,
misunderstanding, misinformation.
God is greater that any of our religions—Christianity or Islam.

Being Christian is not about
establishing, protecting, maintaining, or growing a religion.
It’s about getting Jesus right.
It’s about understanding the depth of God’s love shown to us
in the life, teaching, suffering, death, and resurrection of Jesus.
Jesus didn’t come to earth to establish a religion
that we need to fight to defend.
He came as God’s Son, to authentically represent his Father,
and reconcile people with God.
People and creation had become estranged,
had wandered far, and become lost.
Jesus came to restore the world that God loved,
back to God’s beautiful, whole, and shalom-ordered creation.
That is the measure of true evangelical Christian faith.
Do we get Jesus right?

All of us fall short of “getting Jesus right.”
We fail both to see the light of God’s love and truth
that comes to us in Jesus,
and we fail to share that light with the world,
to fulfill God’s covenant with all descendants of Abraham,
that they might bless all peoples and all creation.

Again, I call us to a prayer of confession and petition.
Turn to #371 in the blue hymnal,
“Let there be light, Lord God of hosts.”
Read through the text quietly and prayerfully.
and then we’ll sing it.

Let there be light, Lord God of hosts,
Let there be wisdom on the earth;
Let broad humanity have birth,
Let there be deeds, instead of boasts.

Within our passioned hearts instill
The calm that endeth strain and strife;
Make us thy ministers of life;
Purge us from lusts that curse and kill.

Give us the peace of vision clear
To see each other’s good our own,
To joy and suffer not alone,
The love that casteth out all fear.

Let woe and waste of warfare cease,
That useful labor yet may build
Its homes with love and laughter filled;
God give thy wayward children peace.

—Phil Kniss, September 12, 2010

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Phil Kniss: Eat, pray, love . . . like God

September 5, 2010
"What’s the gospel word on global wealth?"
Luke 16:19-31; 1 John 4:19-21; Isaiah 58:1-9a; Psalm 146:5-10

Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:

Powered by Podbean.com

...or download a printer-friendly PDF file: click here

...or read it online here:
Today begins a 10-part worship series asking a question,
“What’s the gospel word?”
We’ll ask that question about such diverse, and relevant, topics as
“What’s the gospel word on global wealth and poverty?
on Christian-Muslim relations?
on peace and warfare?
on pornographic culture?
on marriage?
on environmental threats?
on monasticism?
on sports?
on immigration?
on Sabbath economics?”
And no, we’re not being presumptuous
by suggesting there is such a thing as
a Gospel Word on these often divisive,
and highly politicized, issues in our culture.
As to whether there is one “Christian position” on these issues,
I will not be issuing any authoritative declarations,
as if I had that authority.
As to whether there is one political solution,
that deserves to be labeled “Christian”
I won’t even begin to claim knowledge of that.

But I will be bold enough to declare this:
“The Gospel of Jesus Christ does speak.”
The Gospel is not silent.
It has a word, or words, to share.
And it is our task, as the people of God,
the people who claim to follow Jesus in life,
to work together to discern those words,
in reverent examination of the scriptures,
in expectation that the Holy Spirit will speak,
and in mutual covenant with our church community.
The Gospel of Jesus speaks to the pressing issues of our day,
and it is our lifelong task as disciples of Jesus,
as cultural and social realities shift around us,
to keep asking the question,
“What’s the gospel word?”
and to keep listening with humility.

So during this whole series I want to challenge us as a congregation:
Keep listening for the gospel word . . . after you leave this space,
and engage in the everyday life of the church,
as you converse with your companions in faith,
in Sunday School and small groups,
in breakfast or lunch groups,
with family and friends at home.
Keep listening, and keep asking, over and over,
“So what does the Gospel say here . . . in this place and time?”
and, “what does the Gospel say now . . .
given these particular realities?”
_____________________

So let’s jump right into the first question,
“What’s the gospel word on global wealth?”
or more accurately,
“What’s the gospel word on global wealth and poverty?”

It’s good to start here because this is the one about which
scripture has the most to say, of any topic in this series.
Out of hundreds of possible passages
we chose the few you heard this morning.
Let me just point out the obvious, in each one.

Psalm 146 declares the essential nature and character of the Lord,
Yahweh:
Yahweh created the whole heaven and earth.
and is loyal to what he created, forever.
Yahweh executes justice for the oppressed,
gives food to the hungry,
sets the prisoner free,
opens the eyes of the blind,
lifts up those who are bowed down.
If that doesn’t convince you,
just read the rest of the psalms, and the prophets.
Over and over and over we get the message: God’s favors the poor.
God has special regard for those who are bowed down,
who get crushed by other people, or by human systems.
Does God love everybody? rich and poor? Yes, absolutely!!
But does God play favorites? Yes, again. Absolutely!
In the sense that God bestows special favor on the poor,
because the rest of creation doesn’t.
God’s heart of compassion opens especially wide,
for those who are oppressed, or in bondage.
We cannot read scripture and deny God’s priority toward the poor.

But does that apply to us?
What is our responsibility for the poor,
which, as Jesus said, we will always have with us?
_____________________

Did you hear Isaiah this morning?
God says in Isaiah 58,
Do you want my attention?
Do you want my approval?
Don’t come to me with all your sacrifices,
and all your holy fast days,
while you oppress your labor force (v. 3),
while you put your own interests
above the needs of others around you.
Your fasting won’t even cause a blip on my radar
(v. 4, literally, “will not make your voice heard on high”).

Yahweh goes on,
“I’ll tell you what kind of fast gets my attention:
loose the bonds of injustice,
undo the thongs of the yoke,
let the oppressed go free,
break every yoke,
share your bread with the hungry,
bring the homeless poor into your house,
when you see the naked, cover them.”
Then when you call me, I’ll say, “Yes, I hear you.”
When you cry for help, I’ll say, “Here I am.”

Could we find any clearer mandate than this?
God’s priority is toward the poor, the hungry, the oppressed.
And if our posture is not pointed the same direction,
we cut ourselves off from God,
we move ourselves off God’s radar.
_____________________

Then the gospel story today was from Luke 16.
One of Jesus’ parables: the rich man and Lazarus.
Jesus takes these prophetic and poetic words we just heard
from the Old Testament,
and tells us a compelling story to illustrate them.
So a rich man had the finest of clothes,
and the most sumptuous food, every day,
while outside his gate,
in other words, outside of his realm of responsibility,
lay a poor man, hungry, destitute, diseased.
The poor man, named Lazarus, died eventually,
and was carried away to heaven to be with Abraham.
The rich man died, too,
and found himself tormented in Hades.
Tormented especially by his ability to see into heaven,
and notice this poor man, for the first time,
lounging around with Abraham.
So he asked Abraham to send Lazarus to him,
to comfort him with a few drops of water.
Of course, the chasm was too great.
It could not be crossed in death.
In life, he could have crossed the chasm between rich and poor,
but he didn’t.
When the rich man asks Abraham to at least send Lazarus
back to his house and warn those who have not yet died.
Abraham’s response—
they have already heard the voice of Moses and the prophets—
but they didn’t listen.
Why would they listen to this man?
In other words, Jesus said,
listen to the scriptures.
They are perfectly clear.
Show your compassion to the poor, just as God does.
_____________________

And finally, the first epistle of John, chapter 4,
put it rather bluntly this morning:
“We love because God loves.
If you say, ‘I love God,’
but don’t show love to your fellow human beings,
you lie.”
If you don’t love like God loves,
your faith is a sham.
_____________________

I haven’t yet read the book, or seen the movie,
“Eat, pray, love.”
But I’ve heard the gist of the storyline.
It’s about a woman who is on a quest of self-discovery,
after a painful divorce.
So she travels the world in search of herself,
and finds what she’s looking for
in wonderful food in Italy,
in spiritual experiences in India,
and in falling in love in Bali.
I’m sure, on various levels,
this story has plenty to commend it,
and I’ll probably see it someday.

But if you’ll allow me the grace
to criticize something I know nothing about,
I would make this one observation,
from a Judeo-Christian theological framework.
That kind of journey,
is the kind that doesn’t make a blip on God’s radar.
It’s a lot more about pursuing self-interest,
than aligning ourselves with God’s interests.
Eating well, if we want God to notice and approve,
involves sharing our food with the poor.
Praying well, if we expect God to hear,
is not going deeper into ourselves.
We don’t do contemplation
for the sake of contemplating.
If contemplation does not lead to action,
does not lead to solidarity with those crushed by life,
it will also never lead us to the God of the Bible.
And loving well, is far more than finding the one and only soul-mate
who will meet all my needs forever.
Love that gets God’s attention,
is love that does the hard work
of learning to love who and what God loves.
And we have already established
who holds a special place in God’s heart—the poor.

The challenge before us is to eat, pray, and love . . . like God,
to align our priorities with God’s priorities.
_____________________

So let’s talk about what we face in today’s global economy.
What does God think about the globalization of wealth?
What does God think about the state of affairs
in terms of the gap between the rich and poor?
Is there a gospel word that speaks to global economics?

Well, let’s just take a look at some raw facts.
Prepare to be disturbed.

According to the United Nations, and UNICEF,
and other world organizations,
tomorrow morning’s newspaper could run this headline:
“Yesterday over 25,000 People Perished from Extreme Poverty.”
But I can assure you, the paper won’t mention it tomorrow.
Because it would have to run the same headline the next day.
And the next.
Seven days a week, 52 weeks a year, 25,000 people.
The loss of human life from poverty in our world,
is like the earthquake that happened in Haiti earlier this year,
happening every 9-10 days.
It’s like the Asian tsunami that happened in Christmas 2004,
occurring every 10-11 days.
This imaginary newspaper article could go on, saying,
Yesterday, 8,000 children died of malaria,
5,000 adults died of tuberculosis,
nearly 8,000 young adults died of AIDS,
and many thousands died of diarrhea and pneumonia,
and other treatable diseases that prey on bodies
that are weakened from chronic hunger.
These deaths occurred quietly
in some of the poorest villages on earth,
in hospital wards without enough antibiotics,
in homes that had no $6 mosquito nets,
in towns without a safe water supply.
They died without their names being mentioned,
and without any public comment.

A deranged gunman kills 5 or 6 precious human lives,
and, understandably, the news wires run hot,
and it goes global instantly.
But no mention of the 25,000 who died that day from poverty.

It’s perfectly understandable.
It’s called compassion fatigue.
To take in the same, overwhelmingly bad news,
every day,
news that won’t change anytime soon,
would wear us out emotionally.
But it’s helpful now and again to remind ourselves of it.
And ask, what does God think about it?
The God of our Bible does not suffer from compassion fatigue.
God’s heart is big enough
to grieve every time one human being,
that God created in God’s image,
has a life snuffed out,
because the rest of the world had their back turned.
_____________________

I can’t say much about global economics,
because that’s not my expertise or calling.
I only know my calling is to proclaim what we all should know about
the rule and reign of God,
and about God’s mission and agenda.

But from what I read, and understand,
absolute equality of all resources
is not what needs to happen.
It’s a valid argument to say that some inequality
is necessary in a system that also values human freedom.
Because reasonable inequality helps keep us innovative,
helps push us toward higher education,
encourages us to be more productive.

Absolute equality in every sphere is not the concern of the biblical story.
But you better believe that a central concern of the Bible is,
in fact, justice for the poor and oppressed.
People of faith had better be deeply concerned,
when the inequalities in our world get excessive,
to the point that the poor are dehumanized,
ignored,
shoved to the back of our collective awareness and concern.
Christian ethics demands that we look at every human being
as a reflection of the image of God,
who are endowed by God with human dignity.
Whether they live in sub-Saharan Africa,
or the mountains of Pakistan,
or in the slums of New York.

Inequality becomes immoral
when it obstructs at least some persons from realizing
their God-given human dignity within their own communities.
And that is what’s happening now,
all over our world.

For anyone who pretends to read and respect the Bible at all,
disregard for the poor, or even ignorance about the poor,
are not options.
They are immoral, and sinful in God’s eyes.
_____________________

Now there are Christian economists who have different views
on how the global gap between the rich and the poor are addressed.
That’s fine. Let the debate continue.
But let there be no debate about this gospel word:
“God loves the poor, and wants them to be poor no longer.”
No matter what economic system you tout—
capitalism, socialism, or some hybrid of the two—
if you are Christian,
it had better meet this gospel standard:
that the poor are being lifted up out of poverty,
that fewer people are going to bed hungry,
that the massive death statistics are going down.

We are humanly prone to be self-oriented
when it comes to economics—either global or personal.
There will be times when we have to make a choice
between our gospel-oriented moral goals,
and our self-oriented economic goals.

Doing what is right will not necessarily mean,
we always do what boosts the bottom line of our businesses,
that we choose our stock portfolio based
on what fund will be most profitable for us,
or that we always buy our food and clothing
at the cheapest available price.

Asking where things come from,
and how that impacts the human dignity of the poor,
is a question we absolutely need to be asking, and often.
Asking what our money does after it leaves our hands,
is a moral and theological question.

So let’s make this, and every Sunday,
a continuing conversation.
I don’t want my sermons to end, when I end them.
I want them to be catalysts for further discernment.
So please, let’s keep talking together,
and listening together,
for the Gospel Word.
The Gospel does speak.

—Phil Kniss, September 5, 2010

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below and write your comment in the box. When finished, click on "Other" as your identity, and type in your real name. Then click "Publish your comment."]